Like most of the class, I was rather unimpressed after
watching Detropia this Wednesday.
With everything that’s going on in Detroit – both good and bad – I
thought Detropia’s representation of the city lacked nuance and
depth. Instead of delving into the
issues and offering solutions, it seemed to present the facts (but not all of
them) and left me, as a viewer, feeling uninformed and honestly a bit
discouraged about the city’s future.
Because we didn’t have a lot of time to discuss the movie, I
thought that the class blog would be the perfect forum to do so (or to talk
about Detroit in a way that might be more representative of its issues). I think Detroit is really interesting and
applicable to this course for a couple of reasons.
A Detroit School: Then and Now (check out this album for more haunting before and after pictures) |
Firstly, when we talk about policy solutions to issues in
class, we are often faced with the difficulty of finding a policy solution that
can apply to everyone/every city (especially inner city areas). Detroit is a good example of one place in
which I’d venture to say that most of our solutions in class simply wouldn’t
work. With such systemic problems, not
to mention a lack of access to resources and funding, we can’t apply many
policies to Michigan as a whole that would work the same way in Detroit. That being said, I think it requires more
creativity in order to come up with workable solutions. In Detropia, Mayor Bing even talks
about making a rather drastic change by consolidating the city, forcing people
in Detroit’s less populated areas to relocate to the heart of the city. What do you think of the solutions put forth
in the movie? Where do you think reform on Detroit needs to begin and why? Are there any solutions you have heard of
that resonate with you?
Another reason I think Detroit is really interesting is
because it is one place in particular in which youth are called upon to make change. Detropia documents a couple
who moved to the city to engage in street art.
Governor Snyder has many times encouraged young professionals to move to
Detroit. Dan Gilbert (the founder and
chairman of the company Quicken Loans) is working on bringing youth to Detroit over
the next few years (and is trying to draw lots of other businesses to the city,
too – his plan is pretty inspiring!). Young entrepreneurs and youth-driven projects are seen as critical steps in helping the city to flourish. After reading the articles by Liu and
Thompson about millennial attitudes, I can’t help but think that reenergizing Detroit
is a task made for our generation. Our
supposed optimism, creative energy, and lack of emphasis on material goods might
make us the perfect candidates to revitalize to the city.
From "How A Young Community of Entrepreneurs is Rebuilding Detroit" |
Although many articles stress millennials’ helplessness to
achieve a “better” life than their parents, I am still optimistic that we
will. Financially? Materialistically?
Maybe not. Nonetheless, I think that Detropia did
miss some important points; I think that millennials will play a crucial role
in breathing new life into Detroit, which will have huge implications for the
state of Michigan as a whole. It is
questionable that we will have the material luxuries of previous generations,
but I think there’s a lot of power in garnering our millennial-ness and
creating tremendous social change.
As far as policy solutions go, I think that consolidating the city is the absolute worst idea because it is another form of segregation. Just like the housing projects of 1965, which were a complete failure, I believe this concentrated area will be a haven of crime, hopelessness, and another setback for Detroit. We're not putting any extra money into it, so it's bound to fail and become an even greater slum than it already is. If this relocation happens, it will prove that we do not learn from history (which we sort of decided that tends to repeat itself).
ReplyDelete