Thursday, May 30, 2013

Too Few Femillennials: Exploring Feminism's Role in Millennials' Lives


Millennials: the screwed generation, the entitled generation, and the subjects of relentless scrutiny and criticism.  As millennials are repeatedly assessed based on the changing economic circumstances, the social context of their lifetimes is often overlooked (at least more than it should be).  Feminism is one major part of social context that helps explain millennials’ behavior now.  Not only that, but the acceptance (or dismissal) of feminist values among millennials could play a large role in their futures.

In her article “The Wanted Generation,” Amanda Marcotte explores the impact of feminism on millennials’ attitudes and financial situations.  She argues that feminist strides during Generation X have had a huge and highly underestimated impact on the generation.  She explains a few of the key implications of the feminist revolution, especially noting its influence on millennials’ values and family life.
       
These influences stem from the fact that millennials’ mothers are more likely to be older and more educated, traits that changed their parenting approaches.  Also, during the time, women were experiencing a far more equal environment in terms of the workplace.  Another factor was higher access to contraception; this means that millennials are likely to have been “wanted,” meaning their births were planned.  Marcotte draws a causal link between these factors and millennials’ liberalism, higher university attendance, optimistic personalities, likelihood of family stability, high self-esteem and fiscal responsibility, all of which she sees as positive traits.
        
When evaluating how millennials diverge from previous generations, we seem to focus heavily on the economic context, placing huge importance on rising student debt, the recession, and the labor market, all of which undoubtedly play a significant role.  However, the impact of feminism was enormous on both millennials’ personalities and life choices and is something that must be considered when comparing generations.
             
Interestingly enough, despite all of the benefits feminism has caused for millennials, many millennials are reluctant to identify themselves as feminists.  Because of the progress of the feminists before them, millennials may have a sense that equality has been achieved.  In class, we’re looking at stories of educated mothers who choose to be stay-at-home moms, wives who still tend to do more domestic tasks than their husbands, and many other instances of women taking on more traditional gender roles.  Although it’s important that women are able to make these life choices, it’s still problematic; lack of representation in the workforce, reinforcement of gender stereotypes, and fewer contributions from women in certain fields (like science, medicine, and so on) are all negative upshots of this.

From "Where Are All the Millennial Feminists?" by Hannah Weinberger, CNN.
It seems like there’s a tension between the strong influence of the feminist revolution on millennial behavior and the tendency for millennials to distance themselves from the feminist label.  After all of the progress, is it possible that millennials take the feminist movement for granted?  In my experience, this seems to be true. After so many advances, most family members and friends I know see little need for modern day feminism.

Looking at the positive changes the feminist movement has created in the past, is it reasonable to say that there is a need for a new feminist movement?  Do you think that it’d be a good solution to the complicated problems with stay-at-home moms?

4 comments:

  1. In my experience, I have seen a growing stigma surrounding the label "feminist". I remember speaking with my mom about women's issues recently and her telling me that the struggle was over and she felt equality has been reached. I found that troubling, being a self-proclaimed feminist. My sister and I feel adamant that the struggle is not over and while we have solved many obvious problems, there are less obvious problems which many people fail to realize. I think that by having the movement be associated with extremists and by misinforming the public about the mission, it is easy to dismiss modern feminists and drive women away from the cause.

    My proposed solution: offer women's studies classes to everyone! Seriously, Women Studies 220 at the University of Michigan literally changed my life. I think if everyone knew what struggles women still faced, it would facilitate meaningful dialogue.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Before taking a women's studies course here at U of M, I was pretty ignorant about gender inequality in America. Most of what I knew prior to taking that course consisted of extreme oppression in other countries, and this gave me a skewed sense of what was going on here. I agree with your post and with Noelle's comment above. The equality movement seems to be stalled. I think a lot of this has to do with the American perspective of the outside world, though.

    Before I knew the facts about U.S. gender inequality in workplaces, relationships and society at large, I felt that women in America had it relatively good. We're protected under the law from domestic violence and rape, we aren't subjected to clothing regulations, etc. My women's studies class and your post got me thinking: are these the standards for the "good life"? I don't think so. Just because we have it better than many women elsewhere doesn't mean that inequality is a "First World Problem."

    I think Noelle makes a great point: Offering women's studies classes to more students could stop the complacence and start a new feminist movement like the one you're proposing. But even so, there are a lot of Americans who have a tendency to pat our country on the back by comparing it to third world countries.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Your point about our generation being in general more liberal and more educated than the previous generation because our parents were more educated than their parents is an interesting idea, and I agree that liberalism and equality have been sort of normalized and taken for granted even though there is more work to be done. Do you think, given the more liberal and better-educated bent of our generation that we (or our children) can right these issues without the efforts going under a label, or do you think the gender norms and expectations have been normalized such that even our more liberal-minded generation can't recognize them for what they are in order to right the wrong? I agree with Noelle and Kim that simple wider-spread women's studies education could make huge strides toward making these under-the-radar inequalities more recognized and pushed against.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Offering more Women's Studies courses is an interesting proposed solution, but I am torn. I've always said that gender and sexuality studies should be a requisite credit (like that of the Race & Ethnicity credit currently in place), because like you, Noel, WS 220 "literally changed my life." However, one of the problems now is that it is not always accessible for many people, or even relatable. I never would have discovered my inner feminist without coming to college, because it is the theory that really grounded me in the movement and formed my identity. If somewhere around 2/3 of people don't go to college, then we need a solution that doesn't require access to a university or feminist text and theory.

    I also think it's interesting that you, Sara, propose the ending question: "is it reasonable to say that there is a need for a new feminist movement?" I believe the movement has already changed. At Michigan and in the movement at large, there is much more focus on issues that are not just gender-equality based. For instance, some of my favorite courses at UM and the issues that tend to keep me coming back to the movement pertain to the LGBT movement and issues that affect transgender people. This highlights the fact that feminism has become more about equality for all than simply gender equality. It is also why I cringe whenever people critique the movement for being anit-man, because I see a lot of benefits that could be achieved for men through feminist principles.
    on
    Finally, in response to Helen's question: "Do you think, given the more liberal and better-educated bent of our generation that we (or our children) can right these issues without the efforts going under a label, or do you think the gender norms and expectations have been normalized such that even our more liberal-minded generatican't recognize them for what they are in order to right the wrong?" I would argue that there are deeper issues in society that could (and do) fall under the feminist umbrella, but our generation is failing to see them because the issues we are passionate about are still very much playing into the status quo. For example, the majority of my Facebook friends (almost all of whom are Millenials, but not all were people that I expected to do this...) changed their profile pictures in support of marriage equality; however, I could not imagine this happening in the fight against gay youth homelessness, or in support of "non-western" women deciding their own form of "feminism" without the help of "western" women. So, to answer Helen's question, I think the label is still needed and still very powerful, but I think those who do identify with feminism need to realize their privilege in deciding the "agenda of women."

    ReplyDelete