Should I feel guilty expecting to want to focus on a family later in life as a college-educated woman? I feel like that’s the essential question the readings for today have caused me to consider.
My mom had a
well-paying job and when she and my dad planned for their first child, she quit
her job and was a stay-at-home mom until I was a teenager. When I was thirteen
and my little brother was eleven, she went back to work at a job for which she
was overqualified, but which had conditions and hours that were perfect for how
she wanted her work-life to shake out. My dad has worked his way up the
engineering ladder since graduating State with a masters and now manages a team
for RDS Engineering in Battle Creek. We’ve always had enough as far as money
went—solidly middle class, though we always had to save up for vacations, my
brother and I were not given cell phones until college, and we’ve had to take
out loans for school.
Photo from Rants from Mommyland |
Despite the
budget, none of us would trade having my mom at home for anything. She was and
still is superwoman. My dad always split the cooking with her since he loves to
cook and handled all “fix-its,” but she was always the one cleaning, driving us
places and picking us up, and doing the grocery and clothes shopping. And I
guess she has served as my model of the right kind of American mother. Always
there for her kids, always on time, a good cook, an avid reader, an excellent
player of card games. I’ve been educated up the wazoo, I identify as liberal,
but being liberal doesn’t mean I would ever look down on someone who might have
foregone a professional career, but who has instead given her all to her kids
and works very hard to make all aspects of her family’s life run smoothly.
Of course,
as Megan McArdle argues in The DailyBeast, “There are also costs to the old-style Mom's-home-Dad-works marriage
arrangements, which have been well-enumerated by the feminist movement over the
years.” A possible lack of opportunities to self-actualize, for example. This
generation seems to believe, however, that despite those costs, staying at home
is worth it, according to the U.S. Census Bureau: “In a 2005 study, the U.S.
Census Bureau reported an estimated 5.6 million stay-at-home moms. That is a
22% increase from 1994” (Dulce Zamora).
Photo from Generations |
Granted,
work rates have decreased for men as well, given the economy, but only 2.7%. Is
there a squeeze on women to stay home or have attitudes shifted over a
generation?—that is, are women being pushed into these decisions or are they choosing
it? Or do they believe they are making a free choice when in reality society
has already predisposed them? The picture Miller and Belkin paint is of a
generation of women who are ‘opting out’. I think Belkin put it well when she
said, “It’s not that women aren’t competitive; it’s just that they don’t want
to compete along lines that are not compatible with their other goals.” If
their priorities have raising a family over career goals, that is their choice.
The important thing is for a woman to have the same choices a man does when it
comes to their work-life balance.
But “having
the same choices a man does” seems literally impossible. Women do not have the
same choices men do from the moment they are born and given pink balloons. To see
gender socialization in action on children only 3 or 4 years old, here’s a YouTube video. 1:40 on is particularly poignant.
Personally,
the decision for me to stay home at least for five or six years to raise
children would be in my mind a positive choice, not an unwilling reaction, based on my emotional
priorities, but I still wonder if my seemingly free decision is based on
socialized gender expectations and values.
These
priority differences could be almost entirely due to the differences between
male and female socialization and internalized gender roles, expectations, and
mentalities. Both genders lose a little in this societal equation—men get less
time raising their kids, women get less time in the work force. But even if my priorities are a product of
socialization from my infancy, that does not change those priorities. I will
still only be happy if I can devote the majority of my time to raising my
children. In our “Two Income Trap” world, I may still have to work some of that
time. I may even end up trapped, having to work in order to have means and
therefore have to sacrifice time for my kids.
Hopefully I
will be secure enough to at least be able achieve a balance which will give me
the opportunity to advance my own causes and accomplish my personal goals as
well as care of a family. Inevitably, however, my definition of success is not
measurable by how many years I spent teaching or whether or not I ever got
published. Success to me is measured in much the same way as the rest of the
woman who are part of this so-called “opt-out revolution.” The mechanisms influencing
those priories are less certain.
I agree with your situation, Helen – I had a stay-at-home mom when I was younger and I wouldn’t trade it for the world. I feel like growing up in that situation has contributed to so much of my success today (I guess it’d be hard to really tell, but it sure feels that way). Going to the choice problem, I see how it’s so conflicting sometimes for mothers to decide whether or not to pursue professional goals or motherhood, especially personally with my (perceived) benefits of having a stay-at-home parent.
ReplyDeleteWhile having a stay-at-home parent (mom or dad) seems like such a good option for children, I’m interested in even looking at other options for parenting. What about community child rearing? Is it possible for raising children to be less centered on the family and more on the division of community efforts? For instance, extended family, neighbors with children, other community members…can they all play a role in raising children, or does it have to be split solely between a two-parent structure? What about changing workplace conventions (like 8 hour days, or working on site)? I think alternative views on what parenting is or what the workplace is could really help us move forward as a society, making neither mom nor dad feel compelled to sacrifice their career in order to give their children an enriching upbringing or to still play a role in their lives. I think women should be stay-at-home mothers if that’s what they want, but I think there should be as many options possible (not just stay-at-home dads) that allow for rewarding careers and parenthood.
Helen, thank you for sharing your personal experiences and thoughts on mothers who chose to raise their children as opposed to working. Let me second your statement when you say you would not trade your mother at home for anything. My mother, although she would occasionally practice when she felt like it, stopped working for her firm shortly after I was born. Without her constant love, care, and guidance, I would not be where I am today.
ReplyDeleteTo answer the original question you posed: no, you should not feel guilty for wanting to focus on your family later in life as a college-educated women. You should not feel guilty because at the end of the day it is your choice that I am sure your spouse will help you to make. I encourage you to disregard what society says about gender roles and women who stay at home; you will make the right decision depending on what your situation necessitates.
McArdle presents the situation in France, where men are available to take after children, and still choose not to. She presented the argument in an effort to assert that men do less in comparison to women. I find fault with her unfair presentation of these facts and would like to raise the question: is there anything wrong with men not wanting to be as hands on as their female spouse when it comes to raising a child? I personally believe that women are more capable of raising children. I spent nine months inside of my mother; I think it’s only right that she care for me more than anyone else on this earth. Am I sexist for saying that? Or do I just really love my mother? I would like to hear other opinions on this, especially female ones.
Commenting on gender roles, I believe that they are only as important as we make them. I personally loathe seeing the “doll test.” What do children know about anything? What do we gain as a society from seeing kids pick a male or female doll? Nothing. Even though society has perhaps pressured them into thinking that way, they are 5-6 years old and cannot even truly think for themselves. Socialization is powerful, but eventually people grow up and figure out whether they want to live according to convention or not. This is precisely why the study is not done with 20-year olds.
In conclusion, Helen, I think it is important to remember that being a stay at home mother whether through choice or circumstance can be an excellent thing that you should not feel guilty about. Despite facts that say marital issues can stem from disparity of income in-between spouses as a result of staying home, every marriage and situation is different. In the end, you have to make the best decision for your family as a mother (or father for male readers).