Universities
have become unaffordable, inaccessible, and out of touch with what society
actually needs. There have been many potential
solutions to these problems, with online education being the most plausible, in
my opinion; however, I believe these
ideas fail to get to the root of the problems of our current educational
system. What is needed is a radical shift in how we conceive of higher
education.
Students
do not have autonomy over their educational experience. Students are passive actors within a system
that has allowed tuition rates to skyrocket, syllabi and teaching models to become
out of sync with reality, and budgets and institutional investments to fail to
meet students’ ethos. I
propose a cooperative model for higher education. A cooperative
university would address many of my complaints of our current higher education
model.
According to the International CooperativeAlliance,
“A co-operative is an autonomous association of persons united voluntarily to meet their common economic, social, and cultural needs and aspirations through a jointly-owned and democratically-controlled enterprise.”
Is this not what college
should be?
The cooperative university, informed by the cooperative movement, would be founded in the RochdalePrinciples:
1. Democratic Member Control
Every
member gets one vote and an equal voice.
University policies and budgets are determined by voting members rather
than a Board of Regents. Students, then, are active participants in
shaping their educational experience.
Students, faculty, and staff come together to democratically decide the governance
of the university. Those representing the
university in positions of governance are held directly responsible to its
voting members.
2. Voluntary and Open Membership
Acceptance into the university will be open to
people from all backgrounds and identities.
The membership system will be established in a way so as not to
perpetuate the knowledge-based oppression of people of lower socio-economic
classes.
3. Member Economic Participation
A cooperative university is an investment; everyone has a share
of ownership. There is not tuition, but member
charges. Any surplus resources are
reallocated back to student and faculty development, and the development of the
university. All funds, including faculty
salaries, student scholarships, etc., are approved by the membership. Members
are required to contribute “work hours,” which could range from sitting on operational
or budgetary committees, to attending or teaching classes, to contributing to
course projects. These contributions
develop a sense of ownership and community, help to keep costs lower, and offer
students marketable experience.
4. Autonomy and Independence
The curriculum and learning format are decided by all
members. Because decisions are made on a
“one member, one vote” basis, students have just as much say as professors in
determining their education. During the
first week of classes, the students and instructors decide together what will
be included in the course. Students will
have a say in what they learn and decide what is relevant to their lives
outside of the classroom. In this model,
if it works correctly, those with the most experience tend to be acknowledged;
if an instructor has experience in his or her field, they will be able to
propose what is being talked about and studied in the field, and that will hold
some weight. Students can then take that
information to make informed decisions on what they’re learning, and
alternative opinions or dissensions can be more easily addressed. Furthermore, students have the power to
determine the requirements for graduation, the direction of their education,
and the ability to create their own majors.
5. Education, Training and Information
Because
students are active participants in the operational activities of the
university, they will gain concrete, real world experience to prepare them for
the job market while they are in school. Students will graduate with knowledge in
business management, financial literacy, and the ability to work with
others.
6. Co-operation among Co-operatives
Alongside
cooperative education, students will live in cooperative housing. Analogous to dorm life, co-op housing will
supplement students’ education with the social aspect of college. Co-op housing can provide an intellectual
community to extend classroom discussion, provide networking opportunities, and
also foster friendships and a social life for students. Furthermore, members of the university would
be encouraged to utilize cooperative banks, food markets, etc.
7. Concern for Community
The
cooperative university will maintain a commitment to progressive, social
justice activities and the development of the greater community
through policy and direct action. It will be a place for diversity of identity and thought. Furthermore, while upholding high standards
for its members, it would be open to anyone with an interest in the cooperative
movement and a desire to learn.
Do you think a cooperative university would work? How could we incorporate some of these
principles into the current system? Are
there any elements of this model that would not work? Please leave a comment with your thoughts.
Disclaimer: a conversation with my friend, +Ryan Dougherty, largely inspired the ideas presented in this post.
This is a very intriguing way to conceptualize higher education. I think a lot of this makes sense, and I definitely agree that our current system isn't sustainable in the long run. Giving the students a voice with important issues like the budget would allow students to truly invest in their education in a way that no amount of tuition could replicate.
ReplyDeleteThe only part that gives me significant hesitation is the acceptance part--if everyone is accepted, would there be enough resources? Michigan is already very selective and still has a gigantic student population. Could it really stand to be doubled? I absolutely think admissions as they are discriminate based on race and especially socioeconomic class, but I think it's possible to remove those barriers without completely letting go of any sort of criteria. Having some sort of "standard," while potentially unfair, also gives students an increased sense of belonging that, when done well, doesn't need to be entirely exclusionary. New students could be recruited from mentoring programs started at the university, or similar methods that don't completely involve academic standards. This could also be another place where students could have a voice.
Overall very interesting!
Very interesting ideas. I especially like the idea of students contributing more to the teaching of classes. This would almost certainly increase students' investment in their learning of the material, which would hopefully help fight the tendency to skip class!
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteI am also intrigued by this idea, especially coming from a 4 month stint in a co-op at Michigan. Coming from that experience, however, made me aware of how important responsibility (both individual and communal) is for a cooperative initiative to function. In a house setting when things get left for later the biggest issues are dishes in the sink or no dinner made, but in a bigger level (such as a university) those small issues would have much larger consequences. Also, an important aspect about the American university system is the level of competition (getting in and also rankings between schools). How would a co-op education system accomodate for this, since competition would work against communal interests? Wouldn't a person receiving bad grades want their class to be easier than a person receiving high grades (just the first example, albeit bad, that I could think of)? I think the way our education system runs in America is extremely faulty but just getting back from a university that had absolutely no input of the students (they couldn't even choose their classes, yet it was historically founded by students leaving another university) I think we have something that could be modified and not necessarily recreated.
ReplyDeleteRachel, I believe that you have posed an extremely interesting idea with the cooperative university model. I would love to see a model like this succeed for several reasons. Firstly, I agree with you: students do not have autonomy over their education experience. Even though I am a "pre-law" student, it is mandated that I take 7 Natural Science credits to graduate, despite having taken chemistry, biology, and physics in high school. Having autonomy over my education would allow me to focus on taking classes to build skills necessary for my top vocations. This however brings me to my next point: do you envision there being different cooperatives for each broad field of study, or a mix of studies conglomerated into one cooperative? I think perhaps it would be best for specialized cooperatives, especially since the people most interested in a field would have the most impetus to create such an organization. If cooperatives are smaller, how many people do you think should join/form them? In your number 2 you say that acceptance is open to people of all backgrounds and identities and this gives me the impressions that you wish for the admittance into cooperatives to be easier than colleges, but as Emily pointed out, it would be hard to create a cooperative and sustain it when it has possibly a very large population.
ReplyDeleteMy last point of concern would be free riding. Even though people form a cooperative to benefit themselves, how can it be guaranteed that every contributor contributes the same amount? Especially in this category of cooperative where the most educated people have the best chance at success, how can we ensure that competition does not overshadow the fact that the point of the cooperative is to learn together for the betterment of everyone?
Great post Rachel! I really love this idea, and I would love to see it in practice!