As I was browsing the Internet yesterday, I stumbled
upon an article from the New York Daily News discussing a controversial quote that was made by Mayor
Bloomberg on his radio show this past Friday. He was quoted saying “Compare a plumber to going to Harvard
College — being a plumber, actually for the average person, probably would be a
better deal”. His comment struck a nerve
for me. While there is nothing at all wrong with being a plumber, there is
nothing at all wrong with attending Harvard, despite the steep tuition prices.
It is obvious that Mayor Bloomberg thinks a plumber is getting a “better deal”
because he or she will not carry a financial burden of spending $200,000 over
four years. I, however, think “better deal” can mean different things for
different people. To me, a “better deal” would mean living on a college campus
for four years, conversing with all types of people from different backgrounds,
and experimenting with new classes to figure out life goals and ambitions.
Bloomberg doesn’t stop there, but begins to explain his thoughts by saying “You don’t spend ... four years spending $40,000- $50,000 in tuition without earning income.” He’s partially correct according to James Surowiecki, author of the piece we read in class, Debt by Degrees. College is becoming more and more expensive, and exceeding rates of inflation. Surowiecki claims that people are overestimating what a college degree will ensure them. Even more problems arise when students don’t finish school and end up with exceeding large amounts of debt and an incomplete degree. I do agree that prices of college are going up, and oftentimes we use money that we don’t really have to pay for college. However, this is not to say that a financial issue should stop students from attending college and getting a higher education. The article in the New York Daily News also states that not ALL colleges cost $50,000 dollars. There are plenty of state schools, which are less than half that price in tuition per year. It doesn’t have to be as extreme as Bloomberg is saying. People should find what suits them best, whether it is a vocational school, a two-year college, or a four-year university. For me, his words seem discouraging.
Price of college tuition aside, Bloomberg also adds that professions like plumbing won’t ever be dictated by technology, and can ensure job security. Yes, I can admit that maybe college graduates aren’t guaranteed jobs like they were once used to, but what bothered me most was the message that he was sending to young high school graduates. He says, “The people who are going to have the biggest problem are college graduates who aren’t rocket scientists, if you will, not at the top of their class.” Just because someone doesn’t graduate college with a bachelor’s degree in a science field, does not mean they are any less likely to work with technology. In fact, I feel like every degree can be adaptable, especially with there being so many different types of jobs requiring a vast range of skillsets. Majoring in something other than rocket science does not mean you are less competitive in the job market. Mayor Bloomberg should be advocating for all students to aspire to complete a higher education. Today’s jobs require math, science, critical thinking, writing, and communication skills. We are no longer in a world that sees everything in black and white. There is now an intersection between the sciences and the arts.
Yes, college is not for everyone. Yes, there are better options for some people financially. And yes, it is totally okay for people to decide to become a plumber, but only if they feel as though that is what they are satisfied with doing in life, and not because of a fear of outsourcing or never “beating” the rocket scientist.
Nabila- To a degree I agree with your overall sentiments, but I think a few things bear examination. First, many state schools DO cost over $50K for four years. For instance, in-state tuition here at U-M is $7K per semester ($21K for out of state). $7K * 8 Semesters = $56K. Something to think about.
ReplyDeleteAdditionally, Bloomberg's comment about "rocket scientists" isn't specifically about rocket scientists. The sentence reads "..who aren’t rocket scientists, if you will, not at the top of their class." The qualifier of " if you will, not at the top of their class" means that he's talking about people that aren't the "brightest" in their particular fields, whether they be rocket scientists, political scientists, sociologists, economists, etc. He's commenting about the fact that businesses now look at your GPA in addition to your degree, and vet accordingly.
The overall point is that you (plural; I'm not singling you in particular out) have to be careful about making sure you address what's actually said/written, instead of what you interpret. That seems semantic in nature, but semantics are important.
Pete, thank you for you comments. I appreciate the feedback! To clarify, I understand that some in-state schools cost more than $50K over the course of four years. However, I was referring to tuition costs per year. Thank you for pointing this out. I should have made this clearer.
DeleteYou are completely right about my interpretation of the quote. I did not realize this until some time after I posted this blog. Despite my very literal interpretation of this quote, I still think that Bloomberg discredits many with this statement. Drawing from my own experiences, it is very difficult to be the top of your class/field/major when you are competing with such a large number of individuals. At the University of Michigan, even if a person is not exactly the "best" at their major, I do think that his or her perseverance and interest should not deter them from pursuing a job in that field. I think this quote might have been disheartening to many, and sent a negative message to the not-so-confident college population.